
"Get more sleep" is easy advice and a hard number to pin down. Seven hours? Eight? Whatever you can get before the alarm goes off? The honest answer is that sleep scientists have actually converged on a specific figure for adults — and it's lower than the "eight hours" folk wisdom most people grew up with, but higher than what most adults are actually getting.
This isn't a piece about sleep quality, deep sleep stages, or which supplement helps you fall asleep faster — we cover those in the science of deep sleep and NREM vs REM sleep. This is the more basic question: how many hours does an adult actually need, where does that number come from, and how do you know if you're falling short.
In 2015, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and the Sleep Research Society (SRS) convened an expert panel to review the evidence and issue a joint consensus statement on sleep duration for adults. After grading the quality of evidence across hundreds of studies, the panel set a clear floor: adults aged 18 to 60 should sleep 7 or more hours per night on a regular basis to support optimal health.1 Notably, the panel didn't set a strict upper ceiling — their conclusion was that consistently getting more than 7 hours is generally not harmful, though sleeping unusually long can sometimes be a marker of an underlying health issue rather than a cause of one.
The CDC has adopted the same threshold. Its guidance states plainly that the recommended amount of sleep for adults is at least 7 hours each day, and anyone sleeping less than that is classified as having short, or insufficient, sleep duration.2 The National Sleep Foundation's own multidisciplinary expert panel, publishing separately in 2015, arrived at a similar range — recommending 7 to 9 hours for adults aged 26 to 64, narrowing slightly to 7–8 hours for adults 65 and older.3
So the "7 or more" figure isn't a single organization's opinion — it's what three independent expert reviews of the sleep literature landed on. That consistency is worth noting given how much conflicting advice circulates about sleep.
30.5%
of U.S. adults had less than 7 hours of sleep on average in a 24-hour period in 2024, per National Health Interview Survey data — roughly 1 in 3 adults falling short of the minimum. The same survey found 15.4% had trouble falling asleep most days or every day, and 18.1% had trouble staying asleep.4
Those two sets of figures are worth holding apart, because they're different problems with different answers. Not having seven hours available is a scheduling problem. Having seven hours available and not being able to use them is a sleep problem — and roughly one in six adults reports the latter.
The consensus recommendation is a population-level minimum built from evidence across large groups, not a number tailored to any one person. Individual sleep need does vary — a small number of people carry rare genetic variants that let them function on meaningfully less sleep than average. The best-documented is a mutation in the transcriptional repressor DEC2 (hDEC2-P385R), identified in a family with a short-sleep phenotype; transgenic mice carrying the same mutation showed increased vigilance time and less sleep than controls.5 These "natural short sleepers" are a genuine but rare phenomenon, not a lifestyle most people can train themselves into by force of willpower. If you feel like one, the more common explanation is that you've normalised running short — which is what the daytime signals below are for.
Age, activity level, pregnancy, illness, and recovery from sleep debt also shift someone's real nightly need within — and sometimes slightly above — the 7–9 hour band. Need also changes with life stage in ways that aren't about willpower at all; see why sleep changes in your 40s and 50s. The practical takeaway: 7 hours is the line below which the research consistently finds worse outcomes, and most adults do best somewhere in the 7-to-9-hour window rather than right at the floor.
Fewer than seven hours is a number the research keeps flagging — not because eight is magic, but because that's where the data on health outcomes starts to diverge.
It's important to be precise here: these are associations documented in observational and experimental research, not proof that short sleep directly causes any specific disease in any specific person. But the pattern across a large and consistent body of evidence is hard to ignore. The AASM/SRS consensus statement summarized several lines of evidence tied to sleeping under 7 hours on a regular basis:
None of this means one short night wrecks your health. It means the research on chronic, repeated short sleep — night after night, month after month — keeps turning up the same associations across independent research groups. Worth a note on the long-term end of that: short sleep is not on the Lancet Commission's list of 14 modifiable dementia risk factors, for reasons we go through in modifiable dementia risk. Association is not the same as an established risk factor, and we'd rather draw that line than let the list grow by implication.
Hours in bed and hours actually asleep aren't the same thing, and most people are worse at self-assessing sleep sufficiency than they think. A few practical signals tend to show up when someone is running short:
If several of these sound familiar most days of the week, the honest first move is more time in bed and a more consistent schedule before anything else. That's genuinely unglamorous advice, but it's what the evidence supports as the highest-leverage change — and where it sits relative to everything else is mapped out in sleep hygiene tips vs real treatment.
Two things this list does not cover, and both matter. If you're getting a full seven or eight hours and still exhausted, unrefreshing sleep plus snoring or witnessed pauses in breathing points at something a longer night won't fix — start with the STOP-BANG questions. And if the problem is that your sleep window doesn't line up with your body clock rather than that it's too short, that's a different fix entirely: see what actually resets your sleep clock.
To be direct about it: no supplement replaces adequate sleep duration. If you're structurally only giving yourself 5–6 hours of sleep opportunity a night, no product changes that math. Where supplementation has any legitimate role is in the narrower question of whether you can use the window you do have — falling asleep without a long delay, staying asleep through the night.
That's the lane Proco's sleep collection is built for, and here is the part we need to state accurately. Only one product in our range — Sleep Formula — discloses every ingredient dose individually: valerian 150mg, chamomile 100mg, GABA 100mg, L-tryptophan 100mg, lemon balm 100mg, passion flower 100mg, melatonin 2mg. Sleep Support discloses its vitamin B6, calcium, magnesium and melatonin individually, but a further 905mg sits in a 14-botanical blend with no per-ingredient breakdown — the honest version of that label is in Inside Sleep Support. Magnesium Glycinate is a single ingredient at 275mg elemental magnesium, so there's nothing to hide. None of these substitute for the 7-hour floor, and for anyone whose sleep problem has lasted months the intervention with better evidence than any of them is CBT-I.
Correction, September 2026: An earlier version of this article said our sleep products carry a "full ingredient list on every label, doses disclosed as we finish rolling them out." That implied a range-wide disclosure that does not exist and was not about to. Only Sleep Formula discloses every ingredient dose; Sleep Support contains a 905mg botanical blend whose per-ingredient amounts are not broken out, and Cognitive Support contains a 255mg proprietary blend of eight actives that likewise are not disclosed. We have replaced the claim with what's actually on the labels. We also strengthened the sourcing on two figures: the short-sleep prevalence is now tied to the specific 2024 National Health Interview Survey estimate, and the natural-short-sleeper claim now cites the original DEC2 paper rather than a general database link.
Key takeaway: Three independent expert panels — AASM/SRS, the CDC, and the National Sleep Foundation — converge on 7 or more hours per night as the baseline adults need for health, with most people doing best in the 7–9 hour range. 30.5% of U.S. adults fell short of that floor in 2024. A small number of people genuinely need less due to rare genetic variation, but that's the exception, not something most people can assume applies to them.
The number to actually anchor on is 7 hours as a floor, with 7–9 as the range most adults do best in. That's not a wellness-industry talking point — it's where the AASM, SRS, CDC, and National Sleep Foundation independently landed after reviewing the evidence. Chronic short sleep is consistently associated with worse cardiovascular, metabolic, mental health, and cognitive outcomes in the research, even though no single study proves causation for any one person. If your sleep opportunity is regularly under 7 hours, that's the first thing worth fixing — before quality, before supplements, before anything else.
This article is for informational purposes only and has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you experience persistent excessive daytime sleepiness, difficulty staying asleep, or suspect a sleep disorder, talk to a healthcare provider or ask about a referral to a sleep specialist.
Related reading: The science of deep sleep: separating what works from what's marketing and How to fall back asleep after waking at 3am.
Want to know what's actually in what you take? Join the list — no spam, just it straight.